Use cases
One-way, repo-to-repo delivery as clean pull requests. No fork, no shared history, no leaked commits. Here are the workflows it was built for.
The problem. You build in your own repo with internal tooling, draft commits, and team chatter in messages. The client only needs the finished work.
With repo-bridge. Sync each release into the client's repo as a clean PR on a fresh branch. No internal history, no force-push, no shared git ancestry.
The problem. One core product needs to land in many customer repos, each with its own branch protection, reviewers, and rename rules.
With repo-bridge. Configure one source repo and many destinations. Each sync opens a per-customer PR with an AI summary so their reviewers can ship quickly.
The problem. The enterprise repo is locked down: signed commits, required reviewers, no outside collaborators with write access to main.
With repo-bridge. Repo Bridge installs as a GitHub App on the destination, opens PRs from a fresh branch, and keeps your working repo entirely separate.
The problem. You develop in a monorepo but ship a standalone product repo for releases, open source, or partner distribution.
With repo-bridge. Map only the paths that belong to that product. Each sync produces a release-ready PR in the standalone repo with drift detection between syncs.
The problem. You work in a private fork with experiments, vendor patches, and unrelated changes. Upstream only wants the clean fix.
With repo-bridge. Sync just the curated paths into the public repo as a focused PR. No leaked branches, no surprise commits from your private work.
The problem. Regulated codebases must stay isolated. Reviewers need a clear audit trail for every change that crosses the boundary.
With repo-bridge. Every cross-boundary change becomes a reviewed PR with an AI-generated summary, a stamped baseline, and a logged sync job record.
Wire up a source and a destination repo, install the GitHub App, and open your first cross-repo PR in a few minutes.
Create a workspace